跳到正文
arXiv:cs.AI· Onur Selim Kilic, Afra Nawar, Cem Okan Yaldiz, Michael J. Cho, Ahmet Rasim Emirdagi, Demet Tangolar, Amirali Aghazadeh, Amit J. Shah, Omer T. Inan·· 6 小时前AI 评分36

Cylindrical Geodesic Flow Matching 用于准周期生理信号转换

Cylindrical Geodesic Flow Matching for Quasiperiodic Physiological Signal Transformation

AI 导读

研究者提出 cylindrical geodesic flow matching,用于成对心血管波形的转换,解决了 flow matching 标准仿射路径在准周期信号插值时扭曲中间幅度和瞬时频率的问题。

正文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Paired translation between quasiperiodic physiological waveforms (i.e., recovering a target oscillatory signal from the source) is central to the interpretation of cardiovascular signals derived from wearables placed at different body locations. This source-to-target mapping in these problems carries inherent geometric structure: the phase wraps around the cycle and must be treated as a circular variable, the amplitude remains strictly positive, and the beat-to-beat alignment can drift unpredictably across cycles and subjects. While deep neural networks have been used for phase estimation and complex-valued signal modeling, prior work does not explicitly learn phase transport between paired signals. Consequently, neither endpoint-supervised regression nor the standard affine path used in flow matching accounts for this phase--amplitude structure. We introduce \emph{cylindrical geodesic flow matching} for paired cardiovascular waveform translation. We show that the standard affine path used in flow matching distorts intermediate amplitude and instantaneous frequency when interpolating between quasiperiodic signals; replacing it with a closed-form geodesic on the phase--amplitude cylinder eliminates these artifacts and converts each training pair into dense, geometry-consistent velocity supervision. On zero-shot photoplethysmography and limited-support seismocardiography adaptation benchmarks, our method consistently outperforms interpolation baselines and matches or exceeds direct supervised prediction, reducing Hilbert Transform, $L_2$, and Dynamic Time Warping distance by up to ${\sim}15\%$ over the strongest competing baseline. These results suggest that bridge geometry is a critical inductive bias for flow matching on oscillatory signal translation.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.08510 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2610.08510v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.08510

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Onur Selim Kilic [view email]
[v1] Tue, 6 Oct 2026 15:15:07 UTC (2,247 KB)

来源:arXiv:cs.AI · arxiv.org