arXiv:cs.AI· Onur Selim Kilic, Afra Nawar, Cem Okan Yaldiz, Michael J. Cho, Ahmet Rasim Emirdagi, Demet Tangolar, Amirali Aghazadeh, Amit J. Shah, Omer T. Inan·· 6 小时前AI 评分36
Cylindrical Geodesic Flow Matching 用于准周期生理信号转换
Cylindrical Geodesic Flow Matching for Quasiperiodic Physiological Signal Transformation
AI 导读
研究者提出 cylindrical geodesic flow matching,用于成对心血管波形的转换,解决了 flow matching 标准仿射路径在准周期信号插值时扭曲中间幅度和瞬时频率的问题。
正文
Abstract:Paired translation between quasiperiodic physiological waveforms (i.e., recovering a target oscillatory signal from the source) is central to the interpretation of cardiovascular signals derived from wearables placed at different body locations. This source-to-target mapping in these problems carries inherent geometric structure: the phase wraps around the cycle and must be treated as a circular variable, the amplitude remains strictly positive, and the beat-to-beat alignment can drift unpredictably across cycles and subjects. While deep neural networks have been used for phase estimation and complex-valued signal modeling, prior work does not explicitly learn phase transport between paired signals. Consequently, neither endpoint-supervised regression nor the standard affine path used in flow matching accounts for this phase--amplitude structure. We introduce \emph{cylindrical geodesic flow matching} for paired cardiovascular waveform translation. We show that the standard affine path used in flow matching distorts intermediate amplitude and instantaneous frequency when interpolating between quasiperiodic signals; replacing it with a closed-form geodesic on the phase--amplitude cylinder eliminates these artifacts and converts each training pair into dense, geometry-consistent velocity supervision. On zero-shot photoplethysmography and limited-support seismocardiography adaptation benchmarks, our method consistently outperforms interpolation baselines and matches or exceeds direct supervised prediction, reducing Hilbert Transform, $L_2$, and Dynamic Time Warping distance by up to ${\sim}15\%$ over the strongest competing baseline. These results suggest that bridge geometry is a critical inductive bias for flow matching on oscillatory signal translation.
| Subjects: | Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2610.08510 [cs.AI] |
| (or arXiv:2610.08510v1 [cs.AI] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.08510 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) |
Submission history
From: Onur Selim Kilic [view email]
[v1]
Tue, 6 Oct 2026 15:15:07 UTC (2,247 KB)
来源:arXiv:cs.AI · arxiv.org