跳到正文
TechCrunch:AI· Russell Brandom·· 3 小时前AI 评分48

Musubi 发布 PolicyLM-1.7B:用决策模型做实时内容审核

How AI decision models could change content moderation

AI 导读

Musubi 发布开源权重决策模型 PolicyLM-1.7B,可将纯英文撰写的内容政策直接应用于消息审核,判定耗时低于 50 毫秒。该模型无需针对新政策重新训练,成本和速度接近社交平台现有的 AI 分类器,但保留了现代 LLM 的灵活性。联合创始人 Filip Jankovic 称其与 Typesafe AI 的 Jev 属同类模型,但专为内容审核训练,可自行部署运行。

正文

As decision models spread across the industry, a company called Musubi has a new idea for how to put them to work: moderating content. On Tuesday, Musubi announced a lightweight decision model made for real-time moderation called PolicyLM-1.7B, released with open weights.

The idea is to take a content policy written in plain English and apply it to messages in under 50 milliseconds. Musubi’s model is designed to be similar in cost and speed to the AI classifier systems that power moderation on most social platforms — but because it has the flexibility of a modern LLM, it can apply complex policies without special training. Even more important, the model won’t need new training when the policy changes, allowing for human policy-setters to iterate as much as they need.

As Musubi co-founder and chief AI officer Filip Jankovic sees it, it gives platform managers a way to label content proactively.

“Product teams just want a better understanding of what’s happening on their platform, especially as the amount of content is exponentially increasing,” Jankovic says. “Being able to label all of that in a very scalable, customizable way is extremely useful.”

Decision models have become a hot topic in the AI world since the release of Typesafe AI’s Jev in September, which was shortly followed by competing decision models from OpenAI and Amazon. Instead of outputting text, a decision model outputs outcome probabilities, though in this case the model outputs a binary judgement: either the content is in the category or it isn’t. By limiting the model’s output to a set of predetermined choices, decision models are able to run faster and cheaper than large language models, while still maintaining the flexibility of the transformer architecture.

One early use case is reining in misbehavior by AI agents — so it’s only natural to apply the same technology to human misbehavior.

Notably, Jankovic says his interest in decision models predates Jev, tracing it back to a 2024 project called GLiNER (Generalist Model for Named Entity Recognition) that deployed many of the same techniques.

Still, Musubi isn’t wary of the comparison. If anything, the company is eager to use the new interest in decision models to shine a light on content moderation. “If Jev caught your eye, PolicyLM-1.7B is the same kind of model, trained specifically for content moderation, that you can run yourself,” the product announcement reads.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

Russell Brandom has been covering the tech industry since 2012, with a focus on platform policy and emerging technologies. He previously worked at The Verge and Rest of World, and has written for Wired, The Awl and MIT’s Technology Review. He can be reached at russell.brandom@techcrunch.com or on Signal at 412-401-5489.

View Bio

来源:TechCrunch:AI · techcrunch.com