研究：文档即图像表示不适用于科学文献检索，ArXivDoc 基准发布

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Many recent document embedding models are trained on document-as-image representations, embedding rendered pages as images rather than the underlying source. Meanwhile, existing benchmarks for scientific document retrieval, such as ArXivQA and ViDoRe, treat documents as images of pages, implicitly favoring such representations. In this work, we argue that this paradigm is not well-suited for text-rich multimodal scientific documents, where critical evidence is distributed across structured sources, including text, tables, and figures. To study this setting, we introduce ArXivDoc, a new benchmark constructed from the underlying LaTeX sources of scientific papers. Unlike PDF or image-based representations, LaTeX provides direct access to structured elements (e.g., sections, tables, figures, equations), enabling controlled query construction grounded in specific evidence types. We systematically compare text-only, image-based, and multimodal representations across both single-vector and multi-vector retrieval models. Our results show that: (1) document-as-image representations are consistently suboptimal, especially as document length increases; (2) text-based representations are most effective, even for figure-based queries, by leveraging captions and surrounding context; and (3) interleaved text+image representations outperform document-as-image approaches without requiring specialized training.

Subjects:	Information Retrieval (cs.IR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as:	arXiv:2604.18508 [cs.IR]
	(or arXiv:2604.18508v2 [cs.IR] for this version)
	https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.18508 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Ghazal Khalighinejad [view email]
[v1] Mon, 20 Apr 2026 17:00:17 UTC (328 KB)
[v2] Tue, 13 Oct 2026 20:40:04 UTC (330 KB)