跳到正文
arXiv:cs.AI· Rafael M. Mamede, Pedro C. Neto, Ana F. Sequeira·· 13 小时前

什么决定了对抗样本在 Deepfake 检测器之间的迁移性?

What Makes Adversarial Examples Transfer Across Deepfake Detectors?

AI 导读

研究对 60 个 Deepfake 检测器(涵盖六种骨干网络、两种预训练方式和五种训练数据配置)进行了对抗迁移性的受控评估,发现源与目标模型在骨干网络、架构族、预训练方式或训练数据上匹配时迁移成功率显著更高,且这一兼容性结构依赖于攻击方式。

正文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Deepfake detectors remain vulnerable to transfer-based black-box attacks, in which adversarial examples are generated on a source surrogate model and transferred to a target model, unknown to the attacker. Yet how source--target compatibility shapes attack success remains poorly understood. Prior studies evaluate limited detector pools and rarely disentangle architectural from training factors. We conduct a controlled evaluation of adversarial transferability across 60 detectors spanning six backbones, two pretraining regimes, and five training-data configurations, using two attack procedures: AutoAttack (AA) and the Carlini--Wagner attack with Expectation over Transformation (CW--EOT). Matched comparisons reveal significantly higher transfer when source and target share an exact backbone, architecture family, pretraining regime, or training data. This compatibility structure is attack-dependent: exact backbone compatibility has the largest effect under AA, whereas shared pretraining and training data have the largest effects under CW--EOT. When transfer is averaged across non-target sources, mean attack success rate (ASR) is $7.21\%$ under AA and $19.52\%$ under CW--EOT. By contrast, a multi-source oracle combining both attacks attains a \(64.48\%\) mean ASR after excluding exact backbone and training-data matches, showing that source averaging can substantially understate target vulnerability. We release 240,000 adversarially perturbed images, complete pairwise transfer results, detector configurations, and evaluation code. These findings establish source--target compatibility and source-model selection as central dimensions of credible transfer-based black-box robustness evaluation.
Subjects: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.10002 [cs.CV]
  (or arXiv:2609.10002v2 [cs.CV] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.10002

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Rafael M. Mamede [view email]
[v1] Wed, 9 Sep 2026 10:28:36 UTC (2,430 KB)
[v2] Fri, 9 Oct 2026 05:06:59 UTC (2,430 KB)

来源:arXiv:cs.AI · arxiv.org