arXiv:cs.AI· Nam V. Nguyen, Hoang Van Truong, Hieu D. D., Duy Khuong Nguyen, Quang Pham, Tung Kieu·· 16 小时前
Agentic4PDM:面向工业故障诊断的宿主管控证据可采性框架
Agentic4PDM: Host-Governed Evidence Admissibility for Industrial Fault Diagnosis
AI 导读
Agentic4PDM 通过将 LLM 智能体的自适应调查与证据使用控制分离,实现工业故障诊断。其确定性软件控制器(host)执行契约检查的门控裁决(CCGA),要求先承诺完整工具批次再观察结果,并按工具对照标注参考分配证据角色,区分佐证支持与参考信息。该框架支持无需任务特定诊断模型的免训练诊断,在轴承与电机诊断及客户提供的未过滤工业测试集上,聚合 macro F1 优于评估的诊断与智能体基线。
正文
Abstract:We study industrial fault diagnosis as a classification task that assigns sensor time-series windows to predefined health states or fault types. Scarce labels and changing operating conditions make repeated training of specialized classifiers costly. Yet structures such as periodicity, trends, and transients can remain diagnostically informative and be examined through reusable analytical tools. LLM agents can select and interpret these tools, but fixed rules or training-derived guidance may not resolve each signal's ambiguity, while unconstrained interpretation may overstate weak or conflicting results. We introduce Agentic4PDM, a framework that separates adaptive investigation from control over evidence use. LLM agents compare each signal with labeled references from every candidate class, identify unresolved distinctions, and propose follow-up measurements. A deterministic software controller, called the host, enforces contract-checked gated adjudication (CCGA): it checks requests, requires commitment to a complete tool batch before results are observed, and assigns evidence roles based on tool checks against labeled references. These roles distinguish corroborative support from advisory information. The Judge Agent proposes a diagnosis, while the controller checks protocol compliance and records the investigation. Agentic4PDM supports training-free diagnosis using pretrained representations and labeled references without task-specific diagnostic models, and a standard setting that additionally investigates trained-model predictions. Experiments on selected bearing and motor diagnosis challenges and an unfiltered industrial test set supplied by our customer show gains in aggregate macro F1 over the evaluated diagnostic and agentic baselines. Ablations further support the value of the governed workflow.
| Comments: | 67 pages, 12 figures, including appendices |
| Subjects: | Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2610.17786 [cs.AI] |
| (or arXiv:2610.17786v1 [cs.AI] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.17786 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) |
Submission history
From: Nam Nguyen [view email]
[v1]
Tue, 13 Oct 2026 06:14:27 UTC (3,858 KB)
来源:arXiv:cs.AI · arxiv.org