arXiv:cs.LG· Sofia Torres, Gabriel Almeida, Carter Adams, Camila Rocha·· 4 小时前AI 评分44
外部引导何时帮助 LLM 推理?引导增强 GRPO 的偏差-方差理论
When Does External Guidance Help LLM Reasoning? A Bias-Variance Theory of Guidance-Augmented GRPO
AI 导读
论文提出 GA-GRPO 统一理论框架,将外部引导建模为随机引导算子 G 重写问题分布,把 LUFFY、ExPO、PAPO、TAPO 等引导增强方法纳入同一分析,并证明其策略梯度估计器偏差由引导分布与策略分布间的全变差散度 delta_G 界定。
正文
Abstract:Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has become the dominant paradigm for eliciting multi-step reasoning in large language models, and a recent wave of methods (LUFFY, ExPO, PAPO, TAPO) further augments RL with \emph{external guidance} - expert traces, self-explanations, or retrieved thought patterns. Although each method reports empirical gains, none provides convergence rates, bias bounds, or an optimal weighting rule for the guidance signal. We close this gap with \emph{Guidance-Augmented GRPO} (GA-GRPO), a unified theoretical framework that casts external guidance as a stochastic guidance operator G re-writing the question distribution, and analyses the resulting policy-gradient estimator as a biased on-policy estimator whose bias is bounded by the total-variation guidance divergence delta\_G between the guidance-augmented sampling distribution and the policy's own distribution. The framework subsumes vanilla GRPO, LUFFY, ExPO, PAPO, and TAPO as special cases obtained by particular choices of G. Under smoothness and bounded-divergence assumptions we prove that GA-GRPO converges at rate O(1/sqrt(T)) to an O(delta sqrt(T))-neighbourhood of the GRPO stationary point, derive the closed-form MSE-optimal guidance weight lambda-star(T, delta, sigma\_0 squared) = sigma\_0 squared / (sigma\_0 squared + R\_max squared delta squared T), and prove a matching minimax lower bound showing the Omega(delta squared T) bias term is unavoidable. Experiments on Qwen2.5-Math-7B-Base across nine math and OOD benchmarks confirm that optimal-weight GA-GRPO matches or surpasses TAPO, LUFFY, ExPO, and vanilla GRPO while requiring 31\% fewer GPU-hours, and eight analysis experiments validate each theoretical prediction.
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2610.06861 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2610.06861v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.06861 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite |
Submission history
From: Carter Adams [view email]
[v1]
Wed, 8 Jul 2026 14:38:06 UTC (187 KB)
来源:arXiv:cs.LG · arxiv.org