跳到正文
arXiv:cs.LG· Eric G\"unther, Bal\'azs Szabados, Kristof Meding, Gunnar K\"onig, Sebastian Bordt, Ulrike von Luxburg·· 7 小时前AI 评分36

研究者提出"解释卡片":将解释算法与真实世界连接起来

We Need Explanation Cards to Connect Explanation Algorithms to the Real World

AI 导读

研究者提出 Explanation Cards,为算法解释补充鲁棒性与有效性信息及明确的解读说明,可将原本无信息量的解释变得实用,并帮助识别其不适用的情况。以反事实解释和 SHAP 为例,解释卡片将解读责任从用户转移到提供方,作者还认为其为落地 EU AI Act 的可解释性条款提供了可行手段。

正文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Algorithmic explanations are intended to help stakeholders understand opaque algorithmic decisions, but in practice, they often fall short. First, the meaning of algorithmic explanations is often not what one might intuitively expect, so expert knowledge is required to interpret them correctly. Second, recent work has shown that popular explanation algorithms are uninformative about the behavior of complex decision functions. Together, these issues create a gap between what explanations appear to convey and what they actually provide. In this work, we propose Explanation Cards for Explanation Algorithms, which augment standard explanations with complementary information about robustness and validity, as well as clear instructions for interpretation. The complementary information can render otherwise uninformative explanations practically useful, while also helping to detect cases where they are not. Importantly, the interpretation instructions in explanation cards shift responsibility from users to providers: Rather than expecting users to recognize what can and cannot be concluded from an explanation, providers must make this explicit upfront. Using counterfactual explanations and SHAP as examples, we demonstrate how providers can construct explanation cards and that these cards provide users with the guidance needed for sound interpretation. We further argue that explanation cards offer a practical means of operationalising the explainability provisions of the EU AI Act. Overall, explanation cards are a significant step toward making explanation algorithms fit for real-world use cases.
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2606.16786 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2606.16786v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.16786

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Eric Günther [view email]
[v1] Mon, 15 Jun 2026 14:30:18 UTC (724 KB)
[v2] Tue, 6 Oct 2026 11:52:27 UTC (689 KB)

来源:arXiv:cs.LG · arxiv.org