跳到正文
arXiv:cs.AI· Shreya Rajpal, Sonia Sharma, Swapnil Parekh, Lisa Li, Jeyendran Balakrishnan, Nagaraj Janardhana, Andrew Mattarella-Micke·· 6 小时前AI 评分33

先取证再采样:面向推荐系统的可解释隐式负样本候选发现

Evidence Before Sampling: Interpretable Implicit Negative Candidate Discovery for Recommendation

AI 导读

研究提出"隐式负样本候选发现"问题,用符号规则从已观测用户行为中筛选未交互项的负样本候选,并按支持度、信息量和商品相关性打分排序,再由 LLM 结合业务目标与领域知识解读。在工业 B2B 场景和五个公开推荐数据集上,候选质量评估精度高于所对比基线,符号筛选在工业任务中使下游测试 PR-AUC 较随机选择提升 12.5%。该方法将负样本候选有效性与下游推荐性能分开评估。

正文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Recommender systems learn from observed user-item interactions, but explicit negative feedback is often unavailable. Since deep learning models require negative signals for training, negative sampling methods typically treat selected unobserved interactions as negatives. However, a missing interaction does not explain why a user is uninterested in an item or whether there is sufficient evidence to label it negative. This is especially important in business recommendation, where negative signals should be interpretable and aligned with business objectives. We formulate implicit negative candidate discovery to identify unobserved interactions supported by observed customer behavior. We encode these patterns as symbolic rules, score them based on support, informativeness, and product relevance, and rank the retained rules by evidence. An LLM then interprets the retained rules using business objectives and domain knowledge; the interpretations are combined with the statistical evidence in the final report. We evaluate our method in an industrial B2B setting and across five public recommendation datasets. Candidate-quality evaluations in the industrial setting and three public datasets show higher precision than the evaluated baselines, while symbolic selection improves downstream test PR-AUC by 12.5% over random selection with four negatives per positive example in the industrial task. Our results show that negative candidate validity can be evaluated separately from downstream recommendation performance. This distinction enables evidence-based, business-aligned, and explainable negative selection, improving both interpretability and model training in sparse, skewed, real-world recommendation settings.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.07708 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2610.07708v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.07708

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Shreya Rajpal [view email]
[v1] Tue, 6 Oct 2026 04:02:47 UTC (432 KB)

来源:arXiv:cs.AI · arxiv.org