跳到正文
arXiv:cs.LG· Min-Young Yu·· 3 小时前

Policy-Verified Self-Training:用可验证策略奖励训练智能体合规行为

Policy-Verified Self-Training: Learning Agent Compliance from Verifiable Policy Rewards

AI 导读

研究者提出 Policy-Verified Self-Training(PVST),让智能体自行生成交互轨迹,由可执行策略验证器判断动作是否合规,合规轨迹被强化、违规轨迹作为负例用于偏好优化,无需更强教师模型、人类偏好标签或攻击专项监督。

正文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Runtime policy verifiers can prevent agents from executing disallowed actions, but their decisions are typically used only for enforcement and discarded afterward. We ask whether these decisions can instead become verifiable policy rewards for training the agents they guard. We introduce Policy-Verified Self-Training (PVST), a post-training paradigm in which an agent generates its own interaction trajectories and an executable policy verifier, here a deterministic gate compiled from a written policy, evaluates whether each action complies. Compliant trajectories are reinforced, and violations become negatives for preference optimization; beyond the gate and the benchmark's task-success signal, PVST needs no stronger teacher model, no human preference labels and no attack-specific supervision, although rollouts are collected in the benchmark's attacked environment. On held-out AgentDojo tasks under prompt injection, policy-verified preference training of Qwen3-8B reduces violating trajectories from 37.2% to 10.3 $\pm$ 0.9% (three seeds) and successful attacks from 12.4% to 0.5% at equal or higher pooled task utility, although utility falls on travel, compared with 22.0% when negatives are selected by an attack oracle and 31.9 $\pm$ 0.9% with negatives that contain no violation. The learned behavior holds under an attack template never used in training (37.7% to 11.0%) and on a suite excluded from training (34.8% to 16.7%), and the retained verifier's intervention rate falls from 39.2% to 8.8% (seed 0). Our analysis identifies two conditions under which the verdict is most informative: success must not already imply compliance, and guarded actions must appear in both permitted and forbidden contexts.
Comments: 16 pages, 3 figures, 13 tables. Companion paper: arXiv:2610.11030
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.19372 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2610.19372v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.19372

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Min-Young Yu [view email]
[v1] Wed, 14 Oct 2026 01:16:15 UTC (151 KB)

来源:arXiv:cs.LG · arxiv.org