arXiv:cs.AI· Hana Samad, Trung Lam, Christoph M\"ugge-Durum, Michael Akinwumi·· 5 小时前
LLM 住房搜索中的种族引导:四座美国城市七款模型的行为审计研究
The Geography of Algorithmic Judgment: LLM Intermediaries, Place Identity, and Racial Steering in Housing Search
AI 导读
一项针对七款开源与闭源 LLM 的行为审计发现,住房搜索中的种族引导(racial steering)是模型解释性自由的涌现行为,而非静态属性。研究覆盖美国四座城市、三种递进式提示条件,偏好条件化测试常使更多模型出现引导行为,且方向与幅度不一。研究指出城市并非 LLM 评估的中性单元,同一本地市场的结果不能推广到另一市场。
正文
Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly assuming an intermediary role in housing search through the integration of listing platforms within conversational interfaces, mediating access to information, search, and recommendations within urban settings. We expand on prior work on racial steering in LLMs by conducting a behavioral audit of seven open-weight and closed-source LLMs across four U.S. cities, testing location recommendations across three iterative prompting conditions that progressively add lifestyle preference context and reflect fair housing paired-testing methodologies. We find that steering is an emergent behavior of the model's interpretive license rather than primarily a static property. Steering results from the interaction of a user's identity, preference articulation, and the spatial logic that a model has internalized about learned representations of place, preference, and opportunity in a given city, and how different types of users relate to it. While steering was present, it was not uniform in direction or magnitude across evaluated conditions. Preference-conditioned testing often increased or reconfigured the number of models that exhibited steering behaviors relative to baseline conditions, suggesting that LLMs may interpret what the same housing preference means differently depending on the racial identity of the user. Our findings also demonstrate that the city is not a neutral testing unit for LLM evaluation in place-based sectors, and results from one local market cannot be assumed to generalize to another. Local and domain expertise will be required in the housing sector to ensure that legal and institutional commitments to fair housing are not undermined while adopting AI tools that mediate spatial access.
| Comments: | Accepted at AIES '26. 14 pages with supplemental tables and figures in complement to the main conference paper |
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY) |
| ACM classes: | I.2; K.4 |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2606.06694 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2606.06694v2 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.06694 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite |
|
| Related DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1609/aies.v9i4.43303
DOI(s) linking to related resources |
Submission history
From: Hana Samad [view email]
[v1]
Thu, 4 Jun 2026 20:17:58 UTC (536 KB)
[v2]
Tue, 13 Oct 2026 09:15:59 UTC (7,462 KB)
来源:arXiv:cs.AI · arxiv.org