跳到正文
arXiv:cs.LG· Andrej Leban, Theo Saarinen, Yuekai Sun·· 16 小时前

CausalDS:面向数据科学智能体的因果推理基准

CausalDS: Benchmarking Causal Reasoning in Data-Science Agents

AI 导读

研究者推出 CausalDS,一个评估数据科学智能体因果推理能力的基准,每个实例由采样的结构因果模型(SCM)、生成的观测数据和基于真实领域的合成自然语言故事构成,并据此派生覆盖 Pearl 三层级的任务。多数任务含数据科学编码环节,需调用多个工具作答,且对图无法识别的目标直接测试拒答。由于生成器完全合成,题目构成、难度和规模均可作参数调节,可随时抽取新考卷。

正文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) increasingly act as data-science agents, combining abstract reasoning with advanced tool use. Yet the relevant benchmark landscape largely divides into symbolic causal reasoning benchmarks without realistic data analysis or data analysis benchmarks without causal data-generating structure or a range of causal data science tasks. Existing causal evaluation datasets are often restricted to curated examples from existing sources, with diversity coming from limited templatized variations rather than from systematic generation of novel synthetic causal structures. We introduce CausalDS, a benchmark for evaluating causal reasoning in agentic data-science workflows. Each benchmark instance is a scene consisting of a sampled structural causal model (SCM) with generated observational data and an accompanying synthetic natural-language story grounded in a real domain. We ground the composition of the benchmark components in empirical distributions obtained from real-world datasets, thus retaining empirical structure while reducing the memorization risk through completely synthetic generation. From each scene, we then derive tasks spanning all three of Pearl's rungs. Most tasks include a data science coding component, where the model typically needs to use several tools to arrive at the final answer due to imperfect observations. Abstention is tested directly: for targets the graph does not identify, the graded answer is to abstain. The benchmark thus jointly evaluates symbolic causal reasoning, data science, uncertainty quantification, abstention, and tool use/coding. Because the generator is fully synthetic, the exam is not a fixed dataset: composition, difficulty, and size are parameters, and fresh exams can be drawn at will.
Comments: 74 pages, 16 figures. Code at: this https URL
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2607.08093 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2607.08093v2 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.08093

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Andrej Leban [view email]
[v1] Thu, 9 Jul 2026 04:03:26 UTC (434 KB)
[v2] Wed, 14 Oct 2026 02:19:46 UTC (509 KB)

来源:arXiv:cs.LG · arxiv.org