跳到正文
arXiv:cs.AI· Hainiu Xu, V\'{i}tor N. Louren\c{c}o, Mohnish Dubey, Yunfei Bai, Yulan He, Caroline Catmur, Aline Paes, Marco Caserta, Akash Chandrayan, Luca D'Angelo·· 5 小时前AI 评分48

ReFract:用文本世界模型评测语言模型智能体的视角感知能力

ReFract: Benchmarking Perspective Awareness in Language Model Agents with Text World Models

AI 导读

研究者提出 ReFract 基准,包含 150 条经专家验证的条目,要求 LLM 智能体对同一查询根据用户角色做出不同响应,即"视角感知"能力。该基准基于匿名化的领域支持对话构建文本世界模型,模拟智能体运行环境并组装视角感知的动作轨迹。SOTA LLM 最多只能解决 69% 的任务,且超过 50% 的轨迹包含违反角色权限的动作尝试。

正文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Large Language Model (LLM) agents are increasingly deployed in high-stakes settings such as industrial maintenance and equipment fault troubleshooting, where workers occupy a variety of roles. A capable agent must therefore act in a way that is calibrated to user's role: taking actions and providing information that respect the role's knowledge and capability boundaries. Unlike coding, where mistakes are usually recoverable, agent responses in these settings are enacted on physical equipment, and can therefore cause irreversible equipment damage, production loss, or personnel harm. Existing benchmarks, however, largely overlook the need for agents to infer what a role intends and acting only through tools that role may legitimately use, a capability which we term Perspective Awareness. To this end, we introduce ReFract, a benchmark of 150 expert-validated entries in which an agent must act differently in response to the same query depending on user's role. Entries of ReFract are grounded in anonymized queries from domain support conversations, against which we construct Text World Models that simulate the agent's operating environments and assemble perspective-aware action trajectories. State-of-the-art LLMs solve at most 69% of the tasks with more than 50% of their trajectories contain attempts of taking perspective-violating actions. ReFract exposes perspective awareness as a distinct, largely unsolved axis of agent evaluation and motivates agents that calibrate not just how to act, but for whom.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.03356 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2610.03356v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.03356

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Vítor Lourenço [view email]
[v1] Fri, 2 Oct 2026 14:21:26 UTC (16,066 KB)

来源:arXiv:cs.AI · arxiv.org