跳到正文
arXiv:cs.LG· Jacob Searcy, Anish Dulal, Courtney Mathers, Scott Bridgham, Ashley Cordes, Lillian Aoki, Brendan Bohannan, Qing Zhu, Lucas C. R. Silva·· 7 小时前AI 评分35

面向多样生态系统的足迹感知高分辨率碳通量预测方法

A Footprint-Aware, High-Resolution Approach for Carbon Flux Prediction Across Diverse Ecosystems

AI 导读

研究者提出 Footprint-Aware Regression(FAR)深度学习框架,可同时预测 EC 通量塔的空间足迹与像素级 CO2 通量,从而消除高分辨率升尺度模型在异质地貌中的偏差。

正文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Eddy-covariance (EC) flux towers provide in situ measurements of $CO_2$ flux and serve as the ground-truth data for predictive `upscaling' models derived from satellite products. However, many satellites now resolve spatial scales smaller than an EC tower's footprint. We show theoretically that upscaling models trained on high-resolution data in heterogeneous landscapes must account for an EC tower's footprint to avoid bias in pixel-level predictors. To address this problem, we introduce Footprint-Aware Regression (FAR), a deep-learning framework that simultaneously predicts spatial footprints and pixel-level estimates of $CO_2$ flux, and show it yields unbiased pixel-level predictions given sufficient training data. We demonstrate FAR on our AMERI-FAR25 dataset, which combines 205 site-years of tower data with corresponding Landsat scenes, and show that FAR outperforms non-footprint-aware models. FAR increased half-hourly $R^2$ from approximately 0.575 to 0.634 and reduced RMSE by about 7% relative to the best fixed-footprint baseline on a dataset of withheld sites. Gains are larger for monthly and yearly averages relative to a coarser 990 m baseline. Site-level analyses show that these gains extend across multiple ecosystem types. These performance gains are observed whether footprints are learned jointly or estimated independently using an established footprint model, despite substantial variation in footprint size between methods. In a regional comparison over the Western Cascades, FAR produces flux estimates with a distribution comparable to that of existing high-resolution process-based models.
Comments: 31 pages, 9 Figures
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2512.01917 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2512.01917v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.01917

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Jacob Searcy [view email]
[v1] Mon, 1 Dec 2025 17:34:41 UTC (1,402 KB)
[v2] Tue, 6 Oct 2026 00:04:23 UTC (2,916 KB)

来源:arXiv:cs.LG · arxiv.org