跳到正文
HuggingFace Daily Papers·· 1 天前

EmbodiedLab:评测"为知而行"的具身智能体基准

EmbodiedLab: Benchmarking Embodied Agents That Act to Know

AI 导读

EmbodiedLab 是一个要求机器人"通过行动获取知识"的基准,覆盖 5 个学科的 30 项实验和 14 种实验平台,系统参数在每个实例中重新采样,结果无法预先获知但可精确评分。研究在物理仿真实验室中评测六款前沿模型,让智能体自行选择实验步骤并通过摄像头读取仪器;即使最强的智能体在原生控制下成功率也不足一半,多数失败发生在与实验装置的交互环节。

正文 · 原文

Authors:Hongcheng Gao, Zelin Zheng, Alex Zhou, Jay Zhu, Shijia Ge, Yazhe Wang, Xiping Li, Jianshu Zeng, Di Wu, Xuan Shangguan, Yexing Wan, Lingyu He, Yongli Wang, Xiaohan Yu, Zhiqi Jia, Yue Liu, Bryan Hooi, Yinpeng Dong, Wentao Zhang, Sihang Wu, Xiao He

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Embodied agents are expected to accomplish real-world goals by deciding for themselves how and when to interact with their surroundings. For many such goals, changing the physical state of the world is the means rather than the end: the agent changes the state of a system through interaction, observes the feedback, and explores until it either achieves the goal itself (e.g., discovering physical laws) or learns what the goal requires; it acts to know. Manipulation benchmarks stop at acting to change, with the target state given; scientific discovery benchmarks evaluate knowing but replace physical experimentation with symbolic actions or numerical queries. We introduce EmbodiedLab, a benchmark in which a robot must act to know. Quantitative science experiments make this setting controllable: the parameters of the system are resampled for every instance, so the result cannot be known in advance, yet it can be scored exactly. Across 30 experiments in five disciplines on 14 apparatus platforms, the agent receives an objective and the apparatus, chooses its own procedure, and operates a physics-based simulated laboratory, reading the instruments through its cameras. Evaluation checks what the agent came to know, grounded in readings recorded during the episode, as well as the physical state the task requires; every experiment is verified to be solvable. We evaluate six frontier models in their developers' coding agents with native observation and control, with added perception and motion planning, and with manipulation skills distilled from the strongest agents. With native control, even the strongest agent succeeds less than half the time; for every agent, most failures arise in interacting with the apparatus, and manipulation skills help weaker agents more than perception and planning. The benchmark and its evaluation code are available at this https URL.
Comments: Technical report. 19 pages, 10 figures, 9 tables. Project page: this https URL
Subjects: Robotics (cs.RO)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.35385 [cs.RO]
  (or arXiv:2610.35385v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.35385

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Zelin Zheng [view email]
[v1] Mon, 26 Oct 2026 13:06:33 UTC (14,264 KB)

来源:HuggingFace Daily Papers · arxiv.org