跳到正文
arXiv:cs.AI· Songyuan Sui, Zhen Tan, Mohan Zhang, Rana Muhammad Shahroz Khan, Xia Hu, Tianlong Chen·· 5 小时前

多模态越多越好吗?缺失模态鲁棒性的几何视角

Do More Modalities Always Help? A Geometric Perspective on Missing-Modality Robustness

AI 导读

研究揭示一个反直觉的部署期失败模式:在全模态上训练的模型,推理时缺失一个模态可能反而不如单模态模型,该现象出现在融合模型、CLIP 式双塔模型和视觉语言模型中。作者将其归因于主参数子空间中习得的跨模态依赖,并提出 Geodesic Unlearning(GU),一种基于 Grassmannian 子空间几何的轻量参数编辑方法。该论文已被 NeurIPS 2026 主会接收。

正文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Missing modality remains a longstanding challenge in multimodal learning. Existing methods typically address this issue through modality recovery or adaptive strategies. However, they overlook models' internal cross-modal dependencies formed during multimodal training, which later impair robustness. We systematically characterize a counterintuitive deployment-time failure mode: models trained on full modalities can underperform unimodal models when one modality is missing at inference time. This pattern appears across diverse architectures, such as fusion models, CLIP-style two-tower models, and vision-language models. We show that such degradation is closely associated with learned cross-modal dependencies in the principal parameter subspaces. Multimodal training induces structured rotations of these subspaces, particularly in cross-modal interaction layers. These rotations are associated with reduced task-aligned margins and larger task-aware representation harm under missing-modality inputs. We propose Geodesic Unlearning (GU), a lightweight parameter-editing method that leverages Grassmannian subspace geometry for structured subspace correction to improve missing-modality robustness. It rotates the principal input subspace toward a unimodal reference along a geodesic path. We prove that this correction minimizes the distance to the reference within a fixed subspace-distance budget. Experiments across architectures and datasets show that GU improves performance under missing-modality inference while preserving full-modality accuracy, outperforming strong missing-modality robustness baselines. These findings support a geometric view of deployment-time missing-modality degradation and suggest localized subspace editing as a practical route for robustness correction.
Comments: NeurIPS 2026 Main Conference
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.04792 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2610.04792v2 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.04792

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Songyuan Sui [view email]
[v1] Sat, 3 Oct 2026 22:34:19 UTC (192 KB)
[v2] Tue, 13 Oct 2026 10:24:17 UTC (192 KB)

来源:arXiv:cs.AI · arxiv.org