arXiv:cs.AI· Zheng Ren, Yanning Wang, Ziheng Huang, Fei Huang, Shiqi Wang, Ziqian Ye, Yang Yue·· 11 小时前
GeoSpatialBench:面向地理空间推理与受限空间编辑的基准
Mind the Spatial Gap: A Benchmark for Geospatial Reasoning and Constrained Spatial Editing
AI 导读
GeoSpatialBench 是一个评估多模态大模型空间认知的基准,覆盖空间关系理解、几何推理与受限空间编辑,基于六座地理多样城市的真实城市数据,涵盖 28 种拓扑、方向、度量和排序关系,支持结构化 GeoJSON 与地图图像两种模态并经 GIS 操作验证。
正文
Abstract:Understanding and manipulating spatial relations is fundamental to AI systems that reason about physical environments and construct grounded world models. However, existing evaluations of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) for spatial reasoning rely predominantly on static question-answering (QA) over small-scale or synthetic scenes, rarely probing whether models can modify spatial configurations while satisfying explicit geometric constraints. We introduce GeoSpatialBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate an escalating progression of spatial cognition, ranging from spatial relation understanding and geometric reasoning to constrained spatial editing. Grounded in real-world urban data across six geographically diverse cities, GeoSpatialBench evaluates a comprehensive taxonomy of 28 topological, directional, metric, and ordering relations across structured GeoJSON and map image modalities, with ground-truth references and constraints verified via GIS operations. Our empirical evaluation across frontier MLLMs uncovers a stark spatial gap: structured GeoJSON consistently outperforms map images, with multimodal combinations offering no reliable gain over GeoJSON alone, and while models show reasonable competence on qualitative topological and ordering, performance drops on quantitative metric relations. Crucially, editing performance on ordering relations declines relative to QA, and most failed edits violate at least one specified spatial constraint. These results highlight a gap between passively recognizing spatial relations and actively manipulating geometric configurations. GeoSpatialBench provides an open, rigorous diagnostic testbed to benchmark these spatial limitations, laying essential empirical groundwork for physically grounded world models and embodied spatial AI.
| Comments: | 15 pages, 6 figures, 4 tables. Under Review at ICLR 2027 |
| Subjects: | Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2610.12881 [cs.AI] |
| (or arXiv:2610.12881v1 [cs.AI] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.12881 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) |
Submission history
From: Zheng Ren [view email]
[v1]
Fri, 9 Oct 2026 02:16:52 UTC (4,994 KB)
来源:arXiv:cs.AI · arxiv.org