arXiv:cs.CL· Ming Zhang, Qiyuan Peng, Yinxi Wei, Yujiong Shen, Kexin Tan, Yuhui Wang, Zhenghao Xiang, Junjie Ye, Zhangyue Yin, Zhiheng Xi, Shihan Dou, Weikang Wang, Yuhao Zhang, Tao Gui, Ruizhi Yang, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang, Alex Chen, Maxm Pan·· 4 小时前AI 评分41
HyperLogic:一个前向构建、答案由求解器推导的中文逻辑推理基准
HyperLogic: A Hard, Forward-Authored Chinese Logical Reasoning Benchmark with Execution-Derived Answers
AI 导读
HyperLogic 是一个前向构建的中文逻辑推理基准,将题目编写与答案生成分离,由多智能体流程加固本科作者撰写的中文种子题,再由两个不同模型家族的智能体独立翻译为可执行有限域模型,答案经求解器推导并分层裁决。
正文
Authors:Ming Zhang, Qiyuan Peng, Yinxi Wei, Yujiong Shen, Kexin Tan, Yuhui Wang, Zhenghao Xiang, Junjie Ye, Zhangyue Yin, Zhiheng Xi, Shihan Dou, Weikang Wang, Yuhao Zhang, Tao Gui, Ruizhi Yang, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang, Alex Chen, Maxm Pan
Abstract:Existing logic benchmarks primarily measure models' ability to answer reasoning questions directly. Scalable benchmarks often generate text from formal structures, which makes answers easy to compute but fixes the formalization before the problem is written. Forward construction preserves the challenge of finding a faithful formalization, yet makes difficulty and answer reliability harder to control. We introduce HyperLogic, a forward-construction pipeline that separates problem authoring from answer generation. A multi-agent workflow hardens undergraduate-authored Chinese seeds without solving them; two agents from different model families independently translate each finished item into executable finite-domain models; their encodings and solver-derived answers undergo layered, agent-assisted adjudication under human-expert oversight. HyperLogic-Base contains 195 items and 922 sub-questions and separates seven frontier models by 33.0 percentage points in strict item accuracy (44.6-77.6%). HyperLogic-Hard contains 100 items with larger, coupled search spaces, on which no model exceeds 16% accuracy in direct answering. We also use Hard to evaluate agents' ability to formalize and solve problems with tools, comparing a code sandbox alone with one that includes our logic modeling library. The sandbox improves every model by 16.7-40.1 points; adding the library helps five models and hurts two. These results highlight the difficulty of faithful formalization even with tool access.
| Comments: | 39 pages. v2: substantially revised and retitled (v1 title: "LLMEval-Logic: A Solver-Verified Chinese Benchmark for Logical Reasoning of LLMs with Adversarial Hardening"); new construction pipeline, data tiers, and experiments |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.19597 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2605.19597v2 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.19597 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite |
Submission history
From: Ming Zhang [view email]
[v1]
Tue, 19 May 2026 09:40:29 UTC (1,324 KB)
[v2]
Fri, 2 Oct 2026 10:27:24 UTC (683 KB)
来源:arXiv:cs.CL · arxiv.org