HuggingFace Daily Papers·· 1 天前
VibeVideoBench:评估多模态智能体的代码驱动视频生成能力
VibeVideoBench: Evaluating Multimodal Agents on Code-Driven Video Generation
AI 导读
VibeVideoBench 是评估智能体代码驱动视频生成的新基准,含 239 个中英文任务、覆盖 12 个类别,要求智能体在无图像/视频生成模型的沙箱中一小时内交付带声音的 MP4。
正文 · 原文
Authors:Muxi Diao, Wenbin Xu, Lele Yang, Xuyang Ma, Yuzhe Chen, Jiankang Chen, Kaiyu Jiang, Changyi Liu, Haoyu Zhang, Hongyi Fu, Jianxiong Wang, Tianke Zhang, Haonan Fan, Yingxin Li, Bingyi Li, Xu Wang, Xuanyu Zheng, Bin Wen, Tingting Gao, Han Li, Wentao Zhang, Weiran Xu, Kongming Liang, Zhanyu Ma
Abstract:Diffusion video models produce striking clips, but they cannot reliably render an exact formula, a correct chart, a rule-consistent game or narration synchronized to on-screen events. A different route is emerging: multimodal agents that write code to render every frame and synthesize every sound. We introduce VibeVideoBench, a benchmark for evaluating agents on code-driven video generation. Its 239 self-contained tasks in English and Chinese span 12 categories, from data stories and music-driven pieces to classroom lessons and paper explainers; each asks an agent, running in its native harness inside a sandbox with no image or video generation model, to deliver a finished MP4 with sound within one hour. Evaluation is hierarchical and evidence-based: program checks of the delivery spec, about 13k task-specific rubric checks traced to the requirements they enforce, and five quality dimensions anchored per task, scored by three VLM judge panels. Across nine frontier agent systems and 2,151 scored rollouts, GPT-6 Astra and Claude Opus 5.5 rank first and second with both the judges and human annotators, and the strongest system satisfies every core requirement on 76.3% of tasks. Delivery is a second axis: counting missing videos as zero changes the ranking, and three quarters of the lost videos are final renders that started too late, ran too slowly or never started, a failure of how agents plan their hour. Agents build their own rendering pipelines and inspect their own frames, yet how much they look does not predict quality. The judges' ranking of the systems closely matches blind human preferences.
| Subjects: | Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2610.35864 [cs.CV] |
| (or arXiv:2610.35864v2 [cs.CV] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.35864 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite |
Submission history
From: Muxi Diao [view email]
[v1]
Mon, 26 Oct 2026 17:59:32 UTC (4,127 KB)
[v2]
Tue, 27 Oct 2026 16:22:04 UTC (5,770 KB)
来源:HuggingFace Daily Papers · arxiv.org