跳到正文
arXiv:cs.LG· Jeonghwa Lim, Minje Park, Yeongyeon Na, Yujin Eom, Soyeon Lim, Young Ho Lee, Yu Jeong Kim, Sunghoon Joo, Ki Hong Lee·· 4 小时前AI 评分35

标签高效深度学习用于 ECG 波形分割:一项针对常用分割工具的多数据集基准测试

Label-Efficient Deep Learning for ECG Delineation: A Multi-Dataset Benchmark against Widely Used Delineation Tools

AI 导读

一项多数据集基准测试显示,自监督预训练可支撑标签高效的深度学习模型在 ECG 波形分割上全面超越常用分割工具。该模型在全部指标和数据集上排名最佳,在心律多样集上 mIoU 达 71.3%(最强工具为 54.8%),平均逐点敏感度 92.6%(工具为 76.4%),且从窦性心律到心律失常的退化最小。

正文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Electrocardiogram (ECG) delineation, the identification of waveform boundaries, is a foundational step that translates raw ECG signals into clinically interpretable measurements. Deep learning has advanced this task but remains dependent on costly expert annotations. Label-efficient strategies such as self-supervised pretraining and semi-supervised learning are expected to ease this burden, yet it remains unclear whether they yield reliable delineation and whether the deep models they produce outperform the delineation tools used in practice. We address this in two stages. First, comparing self-supervised objectives with supervised or semi-supervised fine-tuning across one internal and four external datasets, we find that pretraining helps but the objective matters, and that the value of semi-supervised fine-tuning depends on the pretraining objective. Second, we benchmark the selected deep learning model against widely used open-source (NeuroKit2, Prominence, ECGdeli) and commercial (CalECG) tools using three complementary metrics. The model ranks best on every metric and dataset, outperforming the strongest tool by a clear margin on the rhythm-diverse set (mIoU 71.3 vs. 54.8%; averaged point-wise sensitivity 92.6 vs. 76.4%), and degrades the least from sinus to arrhythmia. A rhythm-stratified and point-wise analysis further characterizes the distinctive behavior of each tool, yielding practical guidance for tool selection. These results provide systematic, multi-dataset evidence that self-supervised pretraining is effective for ECG delineation and enables a label-efficiently trained deep learning model to outperform widely used delineation tools by leveraging abundant unlabeled data. This supports adopting such models in diverse, real-world clinical settings.
Comments: 20 pages, 5 figures. First two authors contributed equally
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Signal Processing (eess.SP)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.07885 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2610.07885v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.07885

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Minje Park [view email]
[v1] Tue, 6 Oct 2026 07:32:30 UTC (1,118 KB)

来源:arXiv:cs.LG · arxiv.org