跳到正文
原文
AI at Meta· @AIatMeta · X·· 4 小时前AI 评分49
AI 导读

Meta 让数学家通过 meta.ai 聊天界面在 Thinking Mode 下与 Muse Spark 1.1 和 Muse Spark 1.2 协作,在无定制研究框架的情况下攻克尚无解法路径的开放数学难题,并发布六篇论文。研究由数学家主导、第二组数学家评审,每篇论文标注哪些段落主要由人类或 AI 起草,并致谢所依据的既有研究;对其他团队独立宣布的相同问题解法也予以承认。

正文

Following gold-medal-level performance from our AI models across five competitions in mathematics, physics, and chemistry, we asked a harder question: can AI contribute when a problem is genuinely open and without an existing solution path?

Over the past several months, mathematicians worked with Muse Spark 1.1 and Muse Spark 1.2 in Thinking Mode through the regular http://meta.ai chat interface, with no custom research scaffold, to find solutions to such problems.

Our goal wasn't to mass-produce papers, but empower researchers. Every collaboration followed the same principles: mathematicians guided the research, a second group of mathematicians then reviewed the work, each paper marks which passages were drafted primarily by humans or AI, and each credits the prior research it builds on. Where other teams independently announced solutions to the same problems, we acknowledge their work as well.

Today, we're sharing six papers from that collaboration.

🧵👇

来源:AI at Meta · x.com