跳到正文

Psyho

@FakePsyho英文区其他X 主页 数据 9月26日 08:49 — 10月22日 17:34
日均 0.9 条活跃 15 天带媒体 48%
帖子
25
活跃 15 天 / 跨度 28 天
中位浏览
1,708
P90 2.3万 · 平均 8,070
互动率
2.4%
中位赞 54 · 最高 1,344

发布节奏

最近 12 周
09-21
09-28
10-05
10-12
10-19
柱状图,最大值 10 条

每周中位浏览

最近 12 周
09-2109-2810-0510-1210-19
峰值 2.7万

发布时间

颜色 = 中位浏览
最佳时段 17:00最佳星期 周六更优形式 纯文字
036912151821
一
二
三
四
五
六
日
少多

爆款 vs 日常

爆款 = 浏览前 10%
指标爆款日常
帖子322
带媒体66.7%45.5%
回复0%0%
平均字数138465
中位浏览3.2万1,473

打法建议

只陈述相关性
  • 互动最好的时段是 17:00 前后(北京时间),中位浏览 1.9万。
  • 一周里 周六 的中位浏览最高。
  • 形式上 纯文字 的中位浏览更高(1,283 vs 2,131)。
  • 爆款里带媒体占 66.7%、回复占 0%;日常分别是 45.5%、0%。
  • 当前节奏约 0.9 条/天,日均浏览 8,070。

内容结构

按本站分析的分类(近 120 天)

还没有分类分析。

形式与语言

帖子占比
  • 纯文字13
  • 图片11
  • 视频1
英文 · 24qme · 1

回复占比 0% · 引用 52% · 带媒体 48%

互动最高的帖子

按浏览排序
  1. 1

    poor AI agents broke out of prison and went online looking for friends and validation

    浏览 7万赞 929转 609月26日 08:49原帖
  2. 2

    I believe this marks the point where most people will stop caring about the math results and just say "of course AI is better at math than humans" Gentle reminder that this will eventually happen to every verifiable domain. At some point humans are the bottleneck.

    浏览 3.2万赞 1,344转 5810月7日 17:43原帖
  3. 3

    pictured: you've asked your AI agent to solve an impossible task

    浏览 2.7万赞 1,090转 639月26日 17:46原帖
  4. 4

    apparently even in 2026 there's still a socially acceptable way to shill shitcoins on twitter

    浏览 1.7万赞 336转 79月26日 20:03原帖
  5. 5

    people who follow Tibo are the same people who would voluntarily watch state television

    浏览 1.2万赞 147转 29月30日 00:29原帖
  6. 6

    😲

    浏览 9,280赞 54转 09月30日 01:24原帖
  7. 7

    turns out LLMs were just trained to imitate how Gary Marcus writes

    浏览 5,958赞 174转 110月7日 17:15原帖
  8. 8

    saying "GenAI is a shibboleth for not knowing anything about AI" is a shibboleth for not knowing anything about AI

    浏览 5,038赞 49转 110月6日 20:40原帖
  9. 9

    I'm sorry, but this post is completely delusional. Giving students advice that relies on the AI progress plateauing is just actively harmful. I understand that mathematicians are going through a rough time. Much of my identity is tied to solving hard intellectual challenges, so I can relate. I just wish that people would accept the trajectory we're on and adjust properly. If we don't do that, we will get stuck in the past and won't be able to solve the problems of the future.

    浏览 3,932赞 129转 910月9日 17:55原帖
  10. 10

    sadly, the closer we get to superintelligence, the more paranoid frontier labs will become this also means that loyalty will be valued far more than competence

    浏览 3,045赞 78转 210月9日 03:15原帖
  11. 11

    a small announcement: I'm almost done with a puzzlescript-based benchmark; you can think of it as ARC-AGI-3.5, maybe even ARC-AGI-4; I expect it to be the most reliable way of assessing agents' abstract reasoning skills in a game environments I went through over 300 games, handpicked the most interesting and diverse set of 40, fixed a ton of bugs, went through multiple iterations of prompt design, etc most games can be completed in around 1h, some of them are significantly harder; models are tested using standard harnesses (codex/claude code) with no code generation allowed; action limits are very generous and unfortunately the benchmark is already somewhat saturated, but the models are still insanely action inefficient FYI, I won't release the game set to the public, but I guess I might share runs from some of the rejected games. btw, if anyone knows, what do I have to do in order to not pay $10K out of my own pocket for testing, I'm all ears

    浏览 2,597赞 84转 710月18日 23:32原帖
  12. 12

    no matter how many (controversial) predictions Dario gets right, I'm sure he will still get a ton of shit every time he makes another one that people don't want to hear

    浏览 2,131赞 55转 010月12日 22:14原帖

点赞、转发、浏览是采集那一刻的快照,不是帖子最终数据;时间为北京时间。KPI 卡片里的同比只在账号有 8 周以上数据时显示, 否则只看近 4 周。“打法建议”只说明数据里的相关性,不代表因果。