跳到正文

Aadit Sheth

@aaditsh英文区其他X 主页 数据 9月28日 21:43 — 10月30日 16:29
日均 1.2 条活跃 25 天带媒体 14.6%
帖子
41
活跃 25 天 / 跨度 33 天
中位浏览
2,594
P90 1.7万 · 平均 3万
互动率
0.7%
中位赞 4 · 最高 7,566

发布节奏

最近 12 周
09-28
10-05
10-12
10-19
10-26
柱状图,最大值 11 条

每周中位浏览

最近 12 周
09-2810-0510-1210-1910-26
峰值 1.9万

发布时间

颜色 = 中位浏览
最佳时段 21:00最佳星期 周一更优形式 纯文字
036912151821
一
二
三
四
五
六
日
少多

爆款 vs 日常

爆款 = 浏览前 10%
指标爆款日常
帖子536
带媒体0%16.7%
回复0%0%
平均字数389320
中位浏览2.1万2,537

打法建议

只陈述相关性
  • 互动最好的时段是 21:00 前后(北京时间),中位浏览 3,802。
  • 一周里 周一 的中位浏览最高。
  • 形式上 纯文字 的中位浏览更高(2,075 vs 2,747)。
  • 爆款里带媒体占 0%、回复占 0%;日常分别是 16.7%、0%。
  • 当前节奏约 1.2 条/天,日均浏览 3万。

内容结构

按本站分析的分类(近 120 天)

还没有分类分析。

形式与语言

帖子占比
  • 纯文字35
  • 图片6
英文 · 40nl · 1

回复占比 0% · 引用 53.7% · 带媒体 14.6%

互动最高的帖子

按浏览排序
  1. 1

    For whatever it's worth, there is no other platform in the world where the CEO of the third largest company in the world personally responds to a request from his biggest competitor about listing on their platform. Competition aside, let's take a moment to appreciate what a special platform X is. I keep telling my friends this. X has the highest % of influential people actually running their own accounts. Trust me, this is actually Sundar typing on his Pixel, replying to Peter. What an amazing place.

    浏览 103.2万赞 7,566转 27710月4日 07:20原帖
  2. 2

    I love this ad

    浏览 2.5万赞 51转 19月28日 21:43原帖
  3. 3

    Greg Brockman's signature is wild

    浏览 2.1万赞 57转 010月1日 01:34原帖
  4. 4

    the number of surfaces you need to track to use ai properly is getting out of hand. there's cursor, grok, grok bot. chatgpt, codex, and now dots. claude, claude code, cowork. that's three companies & nine surfaces (i'm probably forgetting some). yes, i understand why this happens. different users have different jobs and every team shipping its own surface is faster than coordinating one product. power users genuinely benefit too. but normal people don't want to choose tools. they want outcomes. deciding which surface or model or agent handles the job is the technology's responsibility, not the user's. every choice you push onto the consumer is a small tax on using the product at all. i could be wrong here: codex & claude code have clearly added a ton of arr & grown insanely fast. but still, it's confusing. like try explaining to a normal person when they should use codex vs chatgpt vs dots. you can't. i can't. whoever collapses all of it into one place & hides the routing wins the next phase. the complexity shouldn't live inside the user's head. today, ai is good enough to decide. we all know that. anyway, i love these products. but it's getting a little out of hand.

    浏览 1.7万赞 43转 210月1日 12:21原帖
  5. 5

    It's clear commerce through AI is going to be HUGE. I've started buying everything from body wash to headphones through Instinct. Everyone who takes a cut wins. Stripe wins. AI wins. Amazon loses.

    浏览 1.7万赞 10转 19月29日 22:59原帖
  6. 6

    the factory/cognition drama is a good reminder of what the actual constraint is for ai companies. it's not capital. everyone has near unlimited money now. the constraint is whether the best people in the world want to work for you. and that decision almost entirely runs on reputation. there's a reason everyone wants to work at openai, anthropic etc. comp is table stakes at this level. people are choosing companies for the mission and the humans behind it. that's why it matters so much what your team is posting on x. paul graham wrote an entire essay on this called "mean people fail". one of his reasons was that mean founders can't get the best people to work for them. being nice is easier said than done. but the math is simple: reputation is worth any amount of money to build and no amount of money to destroy. the complication is that most people building in ai are young. nobody trained us to think 100 years out. if we did, i'm sure we'd make more long term decisions. basically, capital is abundant and talent is not.

    浏览 1.6万赞 23转 210月1日 20:50原帖
  7. 7

    I swear it's getting a little out of hand now. Instinct, Muse, Hark, Dots, Grok Bot. It feels like we're all building the same thing. With the exact same pricing: free, $20/mo, $100/mo. I think there will be one or two winners. And it's probably going to come from a large tech company that already has your trust. Google or Apple. Trust is the most important component in this industry. Which company are you willing to give all your passwords to? For most people today, it's Google Chrome or Apple Passwords. And the average consumer (outside SF) will not pressure test 5 agents. They'll just use whatever the default on their iPhone is. Same reason Google is the default search engine on Safari (Google pays Apple around $20B a year for that). I'm just waiting for Apple to really crack on with this AI race. Been waiting a while now. I think they're being deliberately slow. But I really hope when they come out with something, it's very good.

    浏览 1.6万赞 33转 210月7日 19:21原帖
  8. 8

    Alexandr Wang's comms are next level

    浏览 1.1万赞 75转 1210月12日 17:33原帖
  9. 9

    Coming soon: Elon and Ambani partner to deliver affordable, high speed internet across rural India

    浏览 4,757赞 18转 010月10日 04:09原帖
  10. 10

    At this point, I genuinely pray my flight has Starlink. Recently flew New York to Dubai and spent some time the night before checking which plane I'd get and if it would have Starlink. I'm not yet booking flights to try to get Starlink but I can see a world where that happens hahah! And the product barely feels like a product. There's no portal or need to pick a plan or enter your card details or anything. You can just connect to it like any other wifi. The best tech doesn't even feel like tech. The only sad thing is that a plane was the last place on earth I was allowed to be offline. Completely switch off. Maybe put on some stupid movie and just laugh or journal or read a book. Elon's Starlink has taken that freedom away from me because it's just so good!

    浏览 3,802赞 10转 010月8日 21:32原帖
  11. 11

    Back in 2019, I sat the PAT (Physics Aptitude Test) as part of my application to Oxford University. I ended up getting 47/100 (which is bang average) and used the full 2 hours. I missed a bunch of questions - too short on time. Anyway, I got the interview but couldn't get in! Today, I was just curious - can Claude one shot the entire paper? Within 15 mins? Maybe 10 mins? In 1m 10s, Claude one shotted the entire paper and got 96/100 (it lost 4 marks because it described the diagrams instead of drawing them). This was a very fun and interesting exercise. It was nice to go back and read an old paper I'd sat (and remember being extremely, extremely difficult). Everyone around me is saying "AI is so smart, AI is so this and that". But you don't actually feel it until you give it a task that was so difficult before 2022, and now you can suddenly drop it into a chat and get an answer in 1m 10s. Most applicants can't finish this paper in 2 hours. I know people who got into Oxford and even they couldn't complete it. It's wild.

    浏览 3,776赞 2转 210月12日 19:01原帖
  12. 12

    The reason I say Alexandr Wang's comms are next level is because on back to back days, he did David Senra's podcast and John Collison's Cheeky Pint. It's a launch playbook. 1) Do two long conversations instead of 10 press hits 2) Lead with the story, not the specs and jargon 3) The exec is the channel Many AI launches still lead with a company blog post (at least in enterprise). This is changing that and it's absolutely the right way to do it. Well done @Meta comms 👏

    浏览 3,650赞 9转 010月20日 18:36原帖

点赞、转发、浏览是采集那一刻的快照,不是帖子最终数据;时间为北京时间。KPI 卡片里的同比只在账号有 8 周以上数据时显示, 否则只看近 4 周。“打法建议”只说明数据里的相关性,不代表因果。