Claude Code 团队如何做代码审查

Quoting Addy Osmani, Morgan Westlee Lunt, and Qing Wang

AI 导读

Addy Osmani、Morgan Westlee Lunt 和 Qing Wang 撰文谈 Claude Code 团队的代码审查方式，认为"是否有人读过代码"并非判断改动风险的准确标准，关键在于哪种检查（自动或人工）能捕捉问题。审查因此从 PR 末尾的关卡变成持续进行，类似写作时的拼写检查，多数改动在被人类查看前已由 Claude 至少审查并修复过一次，从而把团队注意力留给更高层的问题。

正文

16th October 2026

We think "did a human read the code?" is an imprecise proxy for "what could go wrong with this change, and which check—automated or human—is the right one to catch it?"

Asking that question also changed when review happens. Before, review was a gate at the end of the road: write the code, open a PR, wait for your colleague.

Now, review runs continuously, more like spellcheck while you write. Most changes have been reviewed and fixed by Claude at least once before a human is asked to look. This catches most routine mistakes, and saves team attention for higher-level questions and scrutiny.

— Addy Osmani, Morgan Westlee Lunt, and Qing Wang, How the Claude Code team does code review