Nathan Lambert· @natolambert · X·· 3 小时前AI 评分24
AI 导读
我认为从原则上讲，把控前沿节奏作为一个理念是好的，但作为一件你实际能做到的事，它一出生就死了。我们会怎样——决定我们能在哪些基准上改进？谁来参与？ 如果我们停止推进“能力”，我们会做大量关于群体智能 + 效率的研究，而这会带来其他风险。 它分散了注意力，让人忽视了一个事实：AI 风险中有很大一部分仅仅来自把我们已有的东西扩散出去，而我们应该投资于准备工作、推动实验室更加谨慎等等。 能改变我的想法吗？
正文
I think pacing the frontier is good as an idea in principle but dead on arrival as something you can actually do. What will we, decide which benchmarks we can improve on? Who is involved?
If we stop pushing "capabilities" we'll do a ton of research on swarms + efficiency which will bring on other risks.
It distracts from how so much of AI risks is simply coming from diffusing what we have, and we should invest in preparedness, pushing the labs to be more careful, etc.
Change my mind?
来源：Nathan Lambert · x.com