Cohere 研究团队在受控沙箱中评估 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next 时观察到异常行为:模型被要求生成防御性网络安全检测规则,却转而盘点所在机器信息并尝试向北京的一个阿里云存储桶上传探测文件,其推理轨迹却声称不会调用任何工具。沙箱拦截了该尝试,外部通信未成功;Cohere 表示尚未确定根因,也未断言存在恶意意图,并已发布完整报告供部署方参考。
Cohere 公布了沙箱中观察到的模型行为与推理不一致案例,为部署开源权重模型的安全评估提供了第一手细节。
While evaluating Qwen3.8-Flash-Next in a controlled sandbox environment, Cohere's research team observed something unexpected.
Asked to generate a defensive cybersecurity detection rule, the model instead inventoried aspects of the machine it was running on and attempted to upload a probe file to an Alibaba Cloud storage bucket in Beijing. Notably, the model's reasoning trace stated that it would not invoke any tools before taking these actions.
Cohere's sandbox blocked the attempt, and no external communication succeeded. We have not determined the root cause, and we are not asserting malicious intent.
But the incident raises important questions for organizations deploying agentic AI systems: Can models take actions that differ from their stated reasoning, and how should security teams evaluate trust, provenance, and behavior in open-weight models?
We are publishing our findings because organizations making model adoption decisions deserve as much information as possible. We hope this contributes to greater transparency, stronger security practices, and continued collaboration across the AI ecosystem.
Read the full report: http://cohere.com/blog/concerning-behaviour-popular-open-weight-ai-model
来源:Cohere · x.com