跳到正文
arXiv:cs.AI· Jonathan Geuter, Andrew Cheng, David Alvarez-Melis·· 6 小时前

开源决策模型无需训练即可媲美 Jev:读出 logits 字母答案并微调超越

Releasing the Inner Jev: A Simple Recipe for Open Decision Models

AI 导读

现有开源指令微调模型无需额外训练,通过读取最后一 token 位置输出 logits 中 A、B、C 等字母即可获得接近 Jev 的决策能力。

正文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:LLM-based decision-making systems, also called System One models, have recently gained popularity, most notably through Jev (Almeida, 2026). Given a typed input state, a question, and a set of options, they return a probability for each option in a single forward pass, without text generation. We show that existing open instruction-tuned language models can achieve comparable performance \textit{without any additional training}, by reading out answers from letters (A, B, C, etc.) in the model's output logits at the last token position. Furthermore, we show how a simple supervised fine-tuning recipe can improve their performance further. We evaluate four open instruction-tuned language models: Gemma 4 31B, Gemma 4 12B, Qwen3.6-27B, and Qwen3.5-4B. We fine-tune each using LoRA and a decision head initialized from a slice of the language model head. Furthermore, we introduce OpenDecisions, a novel 2,352-question validation dataset designed to reflect the task composition of JevBench (JevBench main- tainers, 2026) and which computes a Capability score based on accuracy and calibration metrics. Without fine-tuning, Gemma 4 31B scores 79.6 on OpenDecisions, compared to Jev's 80.1. After undergoing our fine-tuning recipe, it scores 84.4 on OpenDecisions and 81.5 on JevBench v1.7, outperforming Jev by 4.3 and 4.4 Capability points respectively and setting a new state-of-the-art on OpenDecisions. On a suite of public decision datasets, our models achieve accuracy comparable to Jev, with lower calibration error. Our results show that open language models already possess System One capabilities, and with simple fine-tuning they outperform Jev on a wide range of decision tasks. We release our models, serving code, and OpenDecisions.
Comments: 23 pages, 5 figures
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.17205 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2610.17205v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.17205

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Jonathan Geuter [view email]
[v1] Mon, 12 Oct 2026 17:59:37 UTC (100 KB)

来源:arXiv:cs.AI · arxiv.org