跳到正文
arXiv:cs.LG· Guy Kornowski, Ohad Shamir·· 5 小时前AI 评分37

梯度下降的最后一次迭代往往(略微)次优

Gradient Descent's Last Iterate is Often (slightly) Suboptimal

AI 导读

研究证明,Jain 等人 2019 年关于 SGD 最后迭代的猜想成立:若无法预先知道总步数 T,任何步长序列都无法保证最优误差。即使在 GD 的无噪声情形下,要获得 anytime 最后迭代保证,也无法避免 T 的多对数因子额外开销。该结果已被 NeurIPS 2026 接收。

正文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:We consider the well-studied setting of minimizing a convex Lipschitz function using either gradient descent (GD) or its stochastic variant (SGD), and examine the last iterate convergence. By now, it is known that standard stepsize choices lead to a last iterate convergence rate of $\log T/\sqrt{T}$ after $T$ steps. A breakthrough result of Jain et al. [2019] recovered the optimal $1/\sqrt{T}$ rate by constructing a non-standard stepsize sequence. However, this sequence requires choosing $T$ in advance, as opposed to common stepsize schedules which apply for any time horizon. Moreover, Jain et al. conjectured that without prior knowledge of $T$, no stepsize sequence can ensure the optimal error for SGD's last iterate, a claim which so far remained unproven. We prove this conjecture, and in fact show that even in the noiseless case of GD, it is impossible to avoid an excess poly-log factor in $T$ when considering an anytime last iterate guarantee.
Comments: NeurIPS 2026
Subjects: Optimization and Control (math.OC); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2604.13870 [math.OC]
  (or arXiv:2604.13870v2 [math.OC] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.13870

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Guy Kornowski [view email]
[v1] Wed, 15 Apr 2026 13:33:08 UTC (15 KB)
[v2] Fri, 2 Oct 2026 06:36:41 UTC (17 KB)

来源:arXiv:cs.LG · arxiv.org